Friday, February 27, 2015
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Stopping the Company from Uplisting
I believe short selling is an epidemic in the OTC markets just now.
While some listed companies can escape short sellers if they have merit, a low price, and are not otherwise suitable for attack, OTC companies generally are under a cloud.
First, the general opinion, not without merit, is that most OTC stocks are a short sellers dream because:
These companies are not managed by persons experienced in the treachery of the stock markets. These managers do not realize that a short attack means a life and death battle. Thus, the company sits there without taking any defensive action and so bleeds to death under the continual attack of a predatory short. Even if a defense is mounted, defense is a losing game -- only attacking back will drive off a short seller. I do not recall seeing any such attack on a short seller, although counter attacks are common in hostile takeover fights over listed companies.
These small companies often are not managed by experienced executives. Successful management of a growing company is a art and a very difficult one at that. One wrong turn and the company falls prey to the vultures.
The entire OTC market is under a cloud with investors and regulators because of frequent abuses by promoters.
Many institutions and other sophisticated investors will not consider low priced or unlisted securities.
The resources of the shorts often exceed the resources of the company.
OTC companies are often long on dreams and short on substance.
OTC companies often lack positive cash flow.
Generally, longs do not rise to the defense of an OTC company when it is attacked. It is their opinion that being sold short is a sign of something wrong and they do not want to take any unnecessary risk. Why swim upstream?
Thus, it is natural for a growing company to want to uplist, to go to a higher exchange or trading venue.
However, such markets require for listing a minimum stock price. Often the company's stock is well below this price. Management orders a reverse split to get the price over the required threshold.
The shorts, as with anything that would benefit the company, immediately try to kill the uplisting effort by blasting the stock back down below the threshold. This will prevent the uplisting. Hopefully, it will demoralize the longs and management as well and cause them to realize that the stock is caught in quicksand -- the more you struggle in quicksand, the more you sink in.
This post is written with one recent example in mind. I will not embarrass management by naming it or showing you the chart.
This was a Pink Sheet company, a product of a reverse merger. The operating company has millions in revenue and even paid a dividend. The idea was to get the stock over $1.00 and make the company fully reporting, a worthwhile goal for a worthwhile company.
A one for 50 reverse split was done and the stock traded over $2.50 per share. At that point the company must have figured they were all set to meet with $1.00 target.
Yet their joy was short lived. Seven months later the stock hit $0.25 -- dropping 90% and putting it below the $1.00 target.
And this company had a stock repurchase program!
While some listed companies can escape short sellers if they have merit, a low price, and are not otherwise suitable for attack, OTC companies generally are under a cloud.
First, the general opinion, not without merit, is that most OTC stocks are a short sellers dream because:
These companies are not managed by persons experienced in the treachery of the stock markets. These managers do not realize that a short attack means a life and death battle. Thus, the company sits there without taking any defensive action and so bleeds to death under the continual attack of a predatory short. Even if a defense is mounted, defense is a losing game -- only attacking back will drive off a short seller. I do not recall seeing any such attack on a short seller, although counter attacks are common in hostile takeover fights over listed companies.
These small companies often are not managed by experienced executives. Successful management of a growing company is a art and a very difficult one at that. One wrong turn and the company falls prey to the vultures.
The entire OTC market is under a cloud with investors and regulators because of frequent abuses by promoters.
Many institutions and other sophisticated investors will not consider low priced or unlisted securities.
The resources of the shorts often exceed the resources of the company.
OTC companies are often long on dreams and short on substance.
OTC companies often lack positive cash flow.
Generally, longs do not rise to the defense of an OTC company when it is attacked. It is their opinion that being sold short is a sign of something wrong and they do not want to take any unnecessary risk. Why swim upstream?
Thus, it is natural for a growing company to want to uplist, to go to a higher exchange or trading venue.
However, such markets require for listing a minimum stock price. Often the company's stock is well below this price. Management orders a reverse split to get the price over the required threshold.
The shorts, as with anything that would benefit the company, immediately try to kill the uplisting effort by blasting the stock back down below the threshold. This will prevent the uplisting. Hopefully, it will demoralize the longs and management as well and cause them to realize that the stock is caught in quicksand -- the more you struggle in quicksand, the more you sink in.
This post is written with one recent example in mind. I will not embarrass management by naming it or showing you the chart.
This was a Pink Sheet company, a product of a reverse merger. The operating company has millions in revenue and even paid a dividend. The idea was to get the stock over $1.00 and make the company fully reporting, a worthwhile goal for a worthwhile company.
A one for 50 reverse split was done and the stock traded over $2.50 per share. At that point the company must have figured they were all set to meet with $1.00 target.
Yet their joy was short lived. Seven months later the stock hit $0.25 -- dropping 90% and putting it below the $1.00 target.
And this company had a stock repurchase program!
Friday, November 14, 2014
Short Selling -- Stopping the Company from Raising Money
One of the great techniques of predatory short sellers is to keep the price of the company stock down.
Now you might think that a short seller would want to increase the price so he could increase his line at a high price.
However, for a company that has negative cash flow, or a company that needs to raise money, a los stock price will cause the company to raise money at lower prices causing more dilution and thus decreasing the value of the stock.
If the price is low enough, it may stop financing altogether. Some institutions have rules about avoiding low priced stock and if you push the price down below their lower limit, finance dries up.
A declining stock price can also cause morale problems among shareholders, employees, and even customers. A declining stock price or a low stock price is taken as evidence of some defect. Key employees with stock options are sensitive to the stock price.
Thus, aggressive predatory short sellers want the price to go down, to continue to do down and to stay down.
As the short seller only recognizes taxable gain when he closes out his position, he may not want the company to fail entirely, just to stay comfortably and surely in the land of the living dead with a price in the cellar and no chance of jumping back to life.
This was a wonderful technique in the days of naked short selling as you could short more than the outstanding stock and by using the laws of supply and demand push the stock into oblivion by destroying all attempts to get new money.
Personally, I find it too predatory to destroy companies with potential just by pushing the price down. We are here to benefit people, not hurt them. We only want to hurt scammers and bums.
This is why it is so wonderful to find some real crooks out there working a manipulation and crush them. You can attack without reservation. Where else do you have this license?
Now you might think that a short seller would want to increase the price so he could increase his line at a high price.
However, for a company that has negative cash flow, or a company that needs to raise money, a los stock price will cause the company to raise money at lower prices causing more dilution and thus decreasing the value of the stock.
If the price is low enough, it may stop financing altogether. Some institutions have rules about avoiding low priced stock and if you push the price down below their lower limit, finance dries up.
A declining stock price can also cause morale problems among shareholders, employees, and even customers. A declining stock price or a low stock price is taken as evidence of some defect. Key employees with stock options are sensitive to the stock price.
Thus, aggressive predatory short sellers want the price to go down, to continue to do down and to stay down.
As the short seller only recognizes taxable gain when he closes out his position, he may not want the company to fail entirely, just to stay comfortably and surely in the land of the living dead with a price in the cellar and no chance of jumping back to life.
This was a wonderful technique in the days of naked short selling as you could short more than the outstanding stock and by using the laws of supply and demand push the stock into oblivion by destroying all attempts to get new money.
Personally, I find it too predatory to destroy companies with potential just by pushing the price down. We are here to benefit people, not hurt them. We only want to hurt scammers and bums.
This is why it is so wonderful to find some real crooks out there working a manipulation and crush them. You can attack without reservation. Where else do you have this license?
Sunday, August 24, 2014
Short Selling -- The One Thing that Crushes the Enemy
What most people, in fact all the people I know of, do not realize is that there is always one thing that causes your enemies to collapse.
So if you are a short seller wanting to crush a stock price or a company, you can find, even if you think not, one thing that causes them to collapse instantly.
Short selling should not be a battle of years, a war of attrition.
Remember you are going for a fast return on your investment as that maximizes return on investment -- ROI is measured as a percentage per year, not a percentage per millenia.
50% ROI in one year is great, 50% ROI in ten year sucks -- think of all the risks you took to get there.
You will know when you find the one thing because the stock price dives and terminates in a total win.
The one thing causes the enemy to flee the battlefield, causes them to retreat in a panic.
The one thing cause the stock to drop like a burst balloon.
The one thing takes a hardened enemy with all guns blazing and makes them collapse into a fast and unconditional surrender. From machine gun blasts to white flag as fast as the flag can be shown.
Unless your attack causes these results you have not found the one thing.
The same is true of companies fighting off short sellers -- the one thing causes the shorts to cover and go away fast.
A careful study of stock market and military battles shows that the one thing, when found, works magic.
What causes soldiers to panic and flee and what causes boards of directors to head to Brazil? There is your answer.
Now if you don't know there is always one thing, you are going to be trying all sorts of moderately useful solutions, but you will not get the result you want.
Find the one thing from experience, from thought, from testing. Find it any way you can, but find it.
You do not need huge resources to win, only the one thing.
So if you are a short seller wanting to crush a stock price or a company, you can find, even if you think not, one thing that causes them to collapse instantly.
Short selling should not be a battle of years, a war of attrition.
Remember you are going for a fast return on your investment as that maximizes return on investment -- ROI is measured as a percentage per year, not a percentage per millenia.
50% ROI in one year is great, 50% ROI in ten year sucks -- think of all the risks you took to get there.
You will know when you find the one thing because the stock price dives and terminates in a total win.
The one thing causes the enemy to flee the battlefield, causes them to retreat in a panic.
The one thing cause the stock to drop like a burst balloon.
The one thing takes a hardened enemy with all guns blazing and makes them collapse into a fast and unconditional surrender. From machine gun blasts to white flag as fast as the flag can be shown.
Unless your attack causes these results you have not found the one thing.
The same is true of companies fighting off short sellers -- the one thing causes the shorts to cover and go away fast.
A careful study of stock market and military battles shows that the one thing, when found, works magic.
What causes soldiers to panic and flee and what causes boards of directors to head to Brazil? There is your answer.
Now if you don't know there is always one thing, you are going to be trying all sorts of moderately useful solutions, but you will not get the result you want.
Find the one thing from experience, from thought, from testing. Find it any way you can, but find it.
You do not need huge resources to win, only the one thing.
Friday, May 30, 2014
FOIA Request for SEC's Naked Short Files
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/journalist-sues-sec-to-get-naked-short-selling-files-2014-05-29
Mark Mitchell, who writes on www.deepcapture.com, has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to obtain the agency’s investigative files relating to more than a dozen aborted investigations and cases involving naked short selling.
This will be interesting. First, the SEC never released results of the investigation into the Bear Stearns case. Second, there have not been many naked shorting cases brought, yet it seems like there were more than a few cases of this abuse.
Stay tuned for further developments. . . .
Mark Mitchell, who writes on www.deepcapture.com, has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to obtain the agency’s investigative files relating to more than a dozen aborted investigations and cases involving naked short selling.
This will be interesting. First, the SEC never released results of the investigation into the Bear Stearns case. Second, there have not been many naked shorting cases brought, yet it seems like there were more than a few cases of this abuse.
Stay tuned for further developments. . . .
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Short Selling -- Research and Destroy
If you had not noticed, or if you have not participated, there is a technique I call "research and destroy."
A stock researcher finds a short sale candidate. This stock may have some hidden fraud, or weak holders, or some other vulnerability. He does his homework and if he does not have his own short fund, he tells those who do.
They all short the stock and once they have a good position, with great fanfare they publish the hit piece on the stock with huge publicity.
The stock craters and the shorts have one of the best trades in the world -- a sure thing and a short term sure thing at that.
Never mind the merits of the company or that the research of the shorts is questionnable, the important thing is scaring the weak shareholders into dumping the stock.
With a fast hit like this, a drive by shooting, no one has a chance to dig into the real facts.
The media, hungry for news, and loving stories that invalidate things and people, give the researcher's claims a wide distribution.
This starts the stampede of the longs to the exits and with the resulting short term imbalance in supply and demand the price goes into free fall.
Only after a month or two can the stock recover if the selling is unwarranted.
But who cares, the shorts have their fast profits and time to cover at leisure.
Risk to the shorts = almost zero. The only question is how far the stock will go before it is time to close out the trade.
Now it helps if the stock is that of a Chinese company traded in the United States as these companies are under a cloud and they do not know how to defend themselves from short sellers.
The big shorts have someone else act as the front man in the media. The big boys like privacy and why put yourself out there to be sued when you can pay someone else to be the public mouthpiece and take the heat.
Where else are you going to find a short term sure thing like this? You put up 50% of the price to go short. If the stock drops about 50%, so you have a 100% profit in a few months. What is the worst that can happen? The stock does not drop on the hit? So you cover even and lose nothing.
Research and destroy.
A stock researcher finds a short sale candidate. This stock may have some hidden fraud, or weak holders, or some other vulnerability. He does his homework and if he does not have his own short fund, he tells those who do.
They all short the stock and once they have a good position, with great fanfare they publish the hit piece on the stock with huge publicity.
The stock craters and the shorts have one of the best trades in the world -- a sure thing and a short term sure thing at that.
Never mind the merits of the company or that the research of the shorts is questionnable, the important thing is scaring the weak shareholders into dumping the stock.
With a fast hit like this, a drive by shooting, no one has a chance to dig into the real facts.
The media, hungry for news, and loving stories that invalidate things and people, give the researcher's claims a wide distribution.
This starts the stampede of the longs to the exits and with the resulting short term imbalance in supply and demand the price goes into free fall.
Only after a month or two can the stock recover if the selling is unwarranted.
But who cares, the shorts have their fast profits and time to cover at leisure.
Risk to the shorts = almost zero. The only question is how far the stock will go before it is time to close out the trade.
Now it helps if the stock is that of a Chinese company traded in the United States as these companies are under a cloud and they do not know how to defend themselves from short sellers.
The big shorts have someone else act as the front man in the media. The big boys like privacy and why put yourself out there to be sued when you can pay someone else to be the public mouthpiece and take the heat.
Where else are you going to find a short term sure thing like this? You put up 50% of the price to go short. If the stock drops about 50%, so you have a 100% profit in a few months. What is the worst that can happen? The stock does not drop on the hit? So you cover even and lose nothing.
Research and destroy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)